CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 62% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider (Saxo Bank). You should consider whether you understand how CFDs, FX or any of our other products work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
The attack at the Abqaiq oil terminal and Khurais oil field leaves a great many questions unanswered. They could remain unanswered.
a) So where were the Saudi air defence systems? Saudi Arabia is the world third largest buyer of arms/ defence equipment (2018 budget $67.6bn). The Saudi military have been engaged in strikes against neighbouring Yemen since March 2015. But there appears to have been no security whatsoever in place for a drone attack.
b) Whilst Yemen’s Houthi rebels have claimed responsibility for the attack there has been zero further comment. It is not the first time the Houthis have launched attacks on Saudi oil infrastructure, pipelines and processing plants. However this attack was very different to previous efforts, it was “surgical” (17/19 targets were hit) with a far more accomplished choice of targets hence the suggestions of military expertise/ Iranian involvement. “Smoking gun” evidence has not been forthcoming from either the debris or spy satellites as to involvement.
c) Iran has denied responsibility for the drone attack. The scale of the strike, we are informed the largest attack on Saudi soil since the Saddam Hussein incursion in 1990, appears out of all proportion to the normal Iranian modus operandi. It looks far too aggressive. We are not aware of Iran’s religious leadership ever having started wars.
d) So far no precise launch location has been identified, and no military response. Even President Trump shied away from directly blaming Iran. The Trump tweet “we are waiting to hear from the Kingdom as to who they believe was the cause of this attack and under what terms we would proceed!” leaves the next step in suspended animation. We also suspect Trump’s disinterest in Middle East military adventurism may be the main factor here.
The Saudi/ Yemen conflict, an ongoing armed conflict involving primarily air strikes/ military intervention has destroyed Yemen creating a refugee crisis and straining the Saudi economy. The Saudi leadership lacks a plan for bringing its military adventurism in the Yemen to a halt. Could this be a final step in the conflict?
The lack of precise data is glaring, with only rough numbers of “5.7m barrels ‘lost’ per day” and 5% of global supplies based on the Saudi terminals’ throughput. There may well be some disruptions to the local market.
However in terms of global oil market disruption, this is far harder to envisage. OPEC has 2m of surplus production capacity that can be tapped quickly. That is before the response from non-OPEC in particular Russia and the USA.
The US Administration response was quick. Trump authorised a release of the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve which would substantially ease US demand pressures for a sustained period. This disclosure dampened the speculative surge in oil prices and might explain the underperformance of WTI v Brent.
The ‘circuit breakers’ already available or employed could well cap further significant oil price gains. The oil demand picture at the moment, (below) annual oil demand growth of c. 1% is hardly the right context for a price surge based on fundamentals.
Indeed the current supply and demand picture looks balanced over 2019 and 2020 with very small additions to global oil inventories. Given the outlook oil prices may well stagnate over the next 12-18 months absent shock events.
Days after the unceremonious sacking of the experienced Saudi energy minister Khalid al-Falih, the drone strike is a significant new problem landing right in the lap of the Saudi royal family. By appointing his half-brother Prince
Abdulaziz Bin Salman to the role of the energy minister, Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman (MBS) arguably lacks the expertise to handle this new problem. Chickens coming home to roost!
Al-Falih was also relieved of his role as chairman of Saudi Aramco for having reservations about the Aramco’s IPO’s merits, its corporate transparency and MBS insistence on obtaining a US$2trn IPO equity valuation. On that point it remains the case that investment institutions are also struggling to justify an Aramco IPO equity valuation of US$2trn. Whether the mooted IPO, which has been discussed off and on for c. 2.5 years will get to market is arguable.
The new leadership is likely to initially struggle to provide the sort of clarity that crisis management at this level requires. Recalling the Jamal Khasogghi murder and the numerous story changes that were peddled, one is left considering the extent to which Saudi OPEC market leadership might be at stake.
Importantly the Saudi leadership will either have to come up with a military/ economic response to this attack or stand back and play a waiting game/ covert war. Whilst we suspect the latter, this is a “known unknown” right now.
We view part of the oil price spike as reflecting increased Gulf tensions rather than any supply problem. We expect at least half the initial gains to be reversed with Brent settling down to its previous range of +/-5/10% from a $60 mid price.
With 70% of Saudi government revenues/ 80% of exports dependent on oil, the Saudi leadership has talked for years about diversifying the economy. Achieving diversification is easier said than done, but the pressure is on. The American shale oil boom which has reduced US demand for OPEC oil has led to a drop in Saudi export earnings from $800m per day in April 2014 to c. $400m in June 2019.
The latest iteration of economic diversification “vision 2030” will require funding and on this point, the drone strike is a short-term problem that could derail Q3. Much depends on the speed at which the repairs get underway at Abqaib and the recovery/ defence plan going forward.
Frankly it is too early to say if the strike has any real lasting impact on revenues. Of greater import will be an early conclusion to the Yemeni armed conflict.
Was I panicking in filling up the car last night? Or simply taking precautions. A bit of both maybe.
Looked at rationally, (I accept this is not always a rational world) I am hard pressed to see the oil price spike and anything other than a spike, i.e. one that is quickly reversed. I am not exiting my holdings of airline/ transport stocks just yet nor am I worried about the improving trend in global equities suddenly skidding on account of an oil slick of higher prices.
Please be aware that the following disclosures of Material Interests are relevant to this research note:
The report’s author certifies that this research report accurately states his personal views about the subject securities, which is reflected in the ratings as well as the substance of the reports.
Collins Sarri Statham Investments Ltd (CSS) does not in any of its publications take into account any particular recipient's investment objectives, financial situation, and specific needs and demands. Therefore, all CSS publications are, unless otherwise specifically stated, intended for informational and/or marketing purposes only.CSS shall not be responsible for any loss arising from any investment based on a perceived recommendation.
No publication (including recommendations) shall be construed as a representation or warranty that the recipient will profit, nor avoid sustaining losses, from trading in accordance with a trading strategy set forth in a publication.
This research is non-independent and is classified as a Marketing Communication under FCA rules detailed in their Conduct of Business Rulebook (COBS). As such it has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote independence of investment research and it is not subject to the prohibition of dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research outlined in COBS 12.2.18.
Trading in the products and services offered by Collins Sarri Statham Investments Ltd (CSS) may, result in losses as well as profits as the value of investments may go down as well as up. You may not get back the full amount you have invested. Any reference to past performance should not be viewed as an indication of any future performance. Investments held in overseas markets are subject to the effects of changes in exchange rates which will impact on the value of the underlying investment. Investments made in AIM and penny shares carry an increased risk due to the difficulty in creating a market in these shares. There may be a substantial difference in the buy and sell price. Leveraged products such as Contracts for Difference (CFDs), derivatives, commodities & Foreign Exchange (FX), carry a higher risk to your capital and they can lose their value rapidly.
The information contained herein is based on materials and sources that we believe to be reliable however we make no representation or warranty, either express or implied, in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained herein. Please note that the figures shown may, in some instances, be rounded to the nearest penny. Prices can move sharply from those quoted in this document. Current prices can be verified by calling one of our brokers. CSS is under no obligation to update the information contained herein. Neither CSS, nor its affiliates, nor its employees shall have any liability whatsoever for any indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from the use of this document.